Conservatives Network

Three Ways Liberals Exploit The Childhood Of Trayvon Martin

admin — Thu, 29 Mar 2012 22:05:53 +0000

Liberals do not care about Trayvon Martin. Their concern isn’t with protecting children or minorities. Trayvon Martin is a child pawn used in their overall scheme to strip us all of our freedoms and make us controlled by government. Liberals don’t care if an innocent child was murdered, rather they view Trayvon as the perfect child to exploit so they can pursue their agenda of total control of your life.

Here are three ways liberals are exploiting the childhood of Trayvon Martin for their own purposes.

Creating more victims. Liberals can not stand the thought of private citizens existing without dependence on the government. Their primary goal is to control everyone, and ration freedom and resources to a ‘needy’ people. Liberals are exploiting the childhood of Trayvon Martin so they can repeal laws that allow citizens to protect themselves. Liberals can’t stand “Stand Your Ground Laws” and conceal carry laws. Why? Because it empowers people to defend their very lives without having to wait/call on the government for help.

Donors money. Racist liberal organizations need money to keep going. They hope to get donations by convincing people they stand against racism and stand for the interests of ‘minorities’. This Trayvon Martin situation is the perfect situation for racist liberal organizations to exploit. Liberals are not standing for Trayvon. They’re standing for their own wallets. Trayvon is the perfect pawn for them to exploit.

Relevancy. Al Sharpton and his racist hoards are in a constant fight to remain relevant. They act like little three-year-olds in constant need of attention and reassurance. Al’s ratings on MSNBC are low, and Jackson hasn’t had much attention since his run for president in 1988. When the faintest scent of anything racial occurs, people like Sharpton and Jackson jump out of their recliners, put on a suit, and look for the nearest camera. They claim they hate racism. Unfortunately for them, without racism, they wouldn’t be relevant. They’re clearly willing to exploit the childhood of Trayvon Martin to remain relevant.

Four Reasons The Liberal Media Hates George Zimmerman

admin — Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:41:37 +0000

We must remember the psychology of a liberal as the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman situation develops. The way they think will help us understand their coverage of this tough situation. I offer to you four reasons why the liberal media, and liberals hate George Zimmerman.

1. Wrong person did the killing. The number one reason liberals hate George Zimmerman is because the wrong person did the killing. Liberals prefer that the mother murder the innocent child. Liberals have been fighting for an entire generation for the mother to be the one able to murder her innocent child. Liberals really aren’t upset with the murder of an African American teenager, they’re really upset that it wasn’t done 17 years ago by the mother.

2. The victim is alive. We must remember that liberals view the criminal as the victim, and the victim as the criminal. A major indicator that Zimmerman is in the right, is the fact that all the liberals are after him. Remember, liberals NEVER stand up for the helpless victim. NEVER.

3. No dependency. Liberals love the idea of dependency. Let’s assume that we knew for sure that Zimmerman was totally in the right. Liberals would still hate him with all their anger. Why? Because he didn’t exercise dependency on the government to protect him. He didn’t allow himself to be made a victim. Zimmerman reminds liberals that people don’t always need the government. Such a stark reminder drives liberals crazy.

4. Wrong color. Another reasons liberals hate George Zimmerman is because he’s the wrong color. He’s part Latino. Notice how they never mention this in their coverage? His ethic mix doesn’t play in to the liberal narrative where all white people are bad. Deep down liberals are mad that this isn’t entirely about black and white. They are trying with all their might to sweep ethnic tensions between African Americans and Latinos under the carpet. In the liberal mind, whites are the only ones capable of oppression. Zimmerman flies in the face of their racial prejudice of white people.

Could Free Online Textbooks Allow Fed. Gov’t Avoid Local Input?

admin — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:54:31 +0000

I found something that is both encouraging but possibly troublesome concerning textbooks and educating children.

The Department Of Education is pushing a thing called Open Education Resources. In a nutshell, it’s a very big resource of free textbooks on various subjects online. Source

On the plus side, school districts could save much money by using free textbooks online.

There is a possible concern. Most textbooks go through a very tough vetting process. After all we’re deciding on what to teach our children. We must know if children are being taught or indoctrinated.

This is mere speculation. I’m asking this question to raise awareness of a possible concern.

Who is vetting these free online textbooks? Will the appeal of free textbooks draw school districts in to use material that hasn’t been vetted? Is this an opportunity for the federal government to influence children while avoiding the rigors of local input?

I don’t know enough about this topic to answer those questions. But I know these are questions some may not be aware they need to be asking.

Please ask them. Please research them.

Are Liberals Heroes For Rescuing An Industry They Helped Sink?

admin — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:52:50 +0000

I’m really sick of liberals riding the moral high horse on the auto bailouts. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Liberals will hold your head under water, then act like heroes when they bring you back up.

It was liberal policies that lead to problems for the auto industry in the first place. Their over regulation, over unionization, and too much government influence along with collateral damage from other policies, lead to problems for the auto industry.

Liberal policy capsized the auto industry, and the liberals act like heroes because they called in the tugboat to bring their sunk ship back to the surface.

Liberals Want Graduates In Debt To Make Them Indentured Servants To Government

admin — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:51:13 +0000

Liberals want to control you from cradle to grave. Government is the liberal’s religious institution meant to control you from birth (Assuming they let you be born.) to the day you die (Or are put to death by a death panel.).

With that as our context, we can understand the reason liberals design policies to inflate college tuition, and demand everyone, regardless of talent, pursue college and higher education.

Liberals are trying to create a scenario where people are indentured servants to the government for a significant period in their life. You may be asking, “What in the world are you talking about?”

In 2007 Congress created the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program. Source

In 2007, Congress created the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program to encourage individuals to enter and continue to work full-time in public service jobs. Under this program, borrowers may qualify for forgiveness of the remaining balance due on their eligible federal student loans after they have made 120 payments on those loans under certain repayment plans while employed full time by certain public service employers.

This is liberal dominionism in full practice. They have engineered the entire college system so your only option is to become an indentured servant to the state. Or as liberals call it, their religious place of worship and devotion.
Follow Us…

Success Inevitable Regardless Of Debt Policy Says Obama Administration

admin — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:15:37 +0000

Listen very closely to Biden in the video below. He’s speaking to governors about the inevitability of success in America. He’s trying to wipe policy differences under the rug by saying our success as a nation is inevitable.

By wiping policy differences under the carpet, he’s basically ignoring a very important policy difference. Democrats and Republicans have very different policies on handling the debt. Our success is not inevitable if we keep building on our huge debt. Biden wants to make us think this issue doesn’t matter when it comes to our success as a nation.

This is the reason the Obama administration is weak on solving our debt issues. They think we’ll succeed regardless of how we handle debt.

Obama’s Dept Of Ed. Indoctrinating Children In Environmental Literacy

admin — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:13:50 +0000

So after you’ve packed your kid a lunch that won’t violate the rules of Obama’s lunch czars, you send them off to school, trusting they will be educated in reading, writing, math, and maybe something in the arts. Little do you know, Obama and his Department of Education are indoctrinating them in ‘Environmental Literacy’.

What exactly are Obama and his green czars teaching children to be literate about?

In a Dept. of Ed. blog entry on being green in schools it says…

Secretary Arne Duncan visited the Green Schools National Conference in Denver yesterday, where he praised the 1,500 educators in attendance for their commitment to greening our schools, developing environmental literacy, and nurturing stewardship and an ethic of sustainability in our students. Source

What exactly is ‘environmental literacy’,’ nurturing stewardship’, and ‘ethic of sustainability’?

What do radical environmentalists mean by being literate stewards who are ethical towards the environment?

We know radical liberals view an increase in population as a threat to the environment. They claim we don’t have enough land and resources for more people. Apparently they haven’t been to Iowa, Montana, Alaska or other parts of the planet not shaded in the color blue on their electoral map.

Yes there may not be enough government entitlement money to support people, but if we allow people to live free, there will be plenty of resources and money to go around.

I need to get back on topic. Liberals are going to merge ‘environmental ethics’ with their perverted views on sex, marriage, procreation, and family. After all, being a good ethical steward of Earth means not having babies, and treating your sexual organs the way liberals say to treat them.

This isn’t just about recycling and solar panels. Rest assured, your sex organs will become involved in proper stewardship and ethics toward Earth if the left continues to further their agenda.

Dept. Educ. Secretary Praises Bringing Green MOVEMENT In To Schools

admin — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:12:30 +0000

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan is very overt in his agenda to bring ‘movements’ in to our schools. Again, are we trying to educate kids or indoctrinate kids? Here are Duncan’s own words to the Green Schools National Network Conference…

Thank you for that generous introduction, Tom [Boasberg]. You’re doing a great job, and Denver is lucky to have you as their leader, promoting the green movement here. I want to thank as well my green schools team leaders at the Department, John McGrath and Andrea Falken, who are here with me today…..

…So, I want to close by thanking you for all that you are doing, and by asking that you keep up your remarkable effort. This is an idea, a movement, whose time has come.

Source

Do you see what the Obama administration is up to here? They don’t view education as education. They view education as a way to push their MOVEMENT on our children.

That’s all I have to say. Just thought you’d like to know this information.

Do Liberals Now Think Being A Slut Is A Bad Thing?

admin — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 00:10:22 +0000

Liberals are upset because Limbaugh called Sandra Fluke a slut. By saying his comment is demeaning, liberals imply a certain judgement on how they view sluts. Liberals don’t view sluts in a positive light.

I mean if they say Limbaugh demeaned Fluke by calling her a slut, then the implication is that a slut is a bad thing/person/whatever.

Isn’t that kind of judgmental of liberals? Liberals are always ripping on conservatives for our ‘conservative values on sex’. Yet here are the liberals making a moral judgement about being a slut.

If being a slut is now a bad thing, then liberals are in error when they tell kids/children they can have sex whenever they want. They are teaching our kids a bad thing when they stand against abstinence.

Liberals can’t have it both ways on this one. If being a slut is a bad thing, then they must stop teaching kids they can have sex when they darn well please. If being a slut is a good thing, then why are they upset with Limbaugh? After all, nothing wrong with being a slut? Right?

David Frum Is Sexist And Demeans Women As He Roasts Rush

admin — Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:26:34 +0000

David Frum just wrote an article describing the differences between Limbaugh and lefties like Maher and other liberal comedians. He splits hairs as he tries to show why we should only be outraged at Rush, and not Maher. Link

Little does Frum know, that as he’s splitting hairs, he’s also becoming very sexist, misogynist and demeaning toward women. Let me break down his arguments as I keep this short and simple. Rush is distinct and unique because…

1. It was said by a ‘prominent’ person and repeated for days.
2. Limbaugh has extreme political influence over people. He influences policy.

So what are the implications of the hair splitting distinctions Frum casts upon Rush, to make him vile and Maher just a non-relevant comedian?

The implications are that if an entertainer says very demeaning stuff about women, but they aren’t ‘prominent’ (As liberals define prominent.) and if they don’t influence political policy, then there is no outrage to be had toward said demeaning comments about women.

How exactly is being o.k. with scathing sexual comments about women, pro-women? As the liberals try to split hairs, and redefine the word ‘prominent’, they actually advocate for that which they claim to be against.

They claim they don’t want women demeaned, sexualized and spoken of wrongly. Yet as they split those hairs, they show agreement with things Maher says about women.

Of course at this point, liberals may say, “We’re not fine with what Maher says about women!”

Well if that’s the case, why aren’t you going after him like you are Rush?

Oh I know why. Because they’re hypocrites.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/05/opinion/frum-rush-limbaugh-fairness/index.html?hpt=hp_c2

Obama Sending $2.55 Billion To Colleges Of The Right Skin Color

admin — Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:02:08 +0000

The Obama administration is awarding $2.55 billion of your hard earned tax money to colleges educating the right skin color. Source

Obama is putting skin color over qualification when he decides to spend your hard earned tax dollars. The money you work hard to send to Obama, is being distributed along racial lines.

Under the Department of Education’s ‘Sharing Responsibility For College Affordability, Quality, and Competition’ plan, they have decided that skin color, not qualification will determine who gets tax payer funding for college education.

In 2004 Obama gave a great speech about how there isn’t a black or white America. Someone should remind him of that speech.

Gurgles And Gasps Of A Dying Desperate Out Of Touch Liberalism

admin — Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:32:30 +0000

How many times the last three years have we heard statements like these from the media?

“Moderate Republicans are being killed off by radical Tea Party candidates.”
“There are no more moderates left in the Republican Party.”
“The Tea Party has destroyed the Republican Party.”

Statements like these are used by the media to portray the Tea Party as the absolute destroyer of ‘reasonable’ minded candidates/elected officials.

Liberals in the media are so out of touch, that they have now turned ‘moderates’ in to a victim class. Liberals refuse to acknowledge that people are becoming more conservative.

This isn’t the destruction of ‘reasonable’ moderates. It’s simply a shift in political thought preference toward more conservative stances by voters.

Liberals in the media are so arrogant, and so out of touch, they refuse to acknowledge that more people are becoming conservative.

The next time you hear someone say, “Moderate Republicans are killed off by the Tea Party.”: Understand that what you really hear is the gurgles and gasps of a dying desperate out of touch liberalism.

Obama Democrats Must Stop Exploiting Rape Victims

admin — Mon, 05 Mar 2012 03:26:26 +0000

Obama and his Democrat stooges must stop exploiting the victims of rape.

In order to push their pro-choice murderous agenda, liberals exploit the innocent victims of rape. This is the most disgusting of political maneuvers.

What is one of the first things pro-choicers say when you advocate for life? “What about rape and incest?”

Pro-choicers use rape victims as an umbrella argument to justify all abortions. Taking rape victims and using them as an umbrella to further the murderous agenda of ‘pro-choice’ in all situations, makes the victims of rape a victim all over again.

Once again, the pro-woman liberals are anything but pro-woman. Rape is a disgusting attack on women. It should not be used as an umbrella argument to justify all abortions.

Liberals Are Running Against A Racist Sexist Misogynist Candidate That Doesn’t Exist

admin — Mon, 05 Mar 2012 03:14:51 +0000

Liberals seem to be running against a candidate that simply doesn’t exist. They’ve conjured up this phantom conservative candidate that wants to take birth control off of drug store shelves, enslave black people, and is out of touch with Americans.

Liberals are projecting the qualities of Obama on to conservatives. It is actually Obama who has racist, misogynist, and out of touch policies.

Let’s start with Obama’s tax payer funded extravagant date nights with his wife. When unemployment is over 9% he was off flying on tax payer funded date nights with his wife. They have the nerve to call conservatives out of touch?

How about Obama’s racist policies? He’s giving out funds for education based on skin color. Source So even if you paid taxes to fund ‘education’ you may not get it back if you’re not the right skin color.

Obama is very, very misogynist. This may be the most anti-woman president we have ever seen. This man has refused to come out against policy/idea influencers in his own camp who use derogatory speech toward women. Obama has had three years to speak up against the filth coming from Bill Maher, who actually donated $1 million to Obama’s SuperPac.

Obama remains out of touch, as he promotes racist policies and remains silent on derogatory speech toward women. Liberals create the fake racist, sexist phantom conservative candidate, because they don’t want us to look at their guy who is actually sexist, racist and out of touch.

Senate Democrats Make Talk Show Host Their Priority Not Jobs For Women

admin — Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:05:37 +0000

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee has priorities that all women in America can believe in. With unemployment still high, gas prices soaring, and women college graduates seeking jobs, Senate Democrats have decided that a talk show radio host is their major concern.

That’s right, plastered in bold across the DSCC.org site is an image calling on people to be upset over a radio talk show host. I thought women needed jobs? I thought women needed affordable gas? What about the whole educating women thing?

Why are Senate Democrats making a talk show host their priority in tough times like these?

Conservative Women Compared To Liberal Women

admin — Sun, 04 Mar 2012 06:21:09 +0000

Mothers Beware – 5 Ways Obama Wages War On Your Child’s Education

admin — Sun, 04 Mar 2012 01:09:48 +0000

Mothers across America wake up. Obama is waging war against your child’s education. He is striking on all fronts.

1. Embezzling education dollars to those he feels deserve the money. Obama is taking your hard earned tax dollars, money meant to educate your child, and he’s embezzling it to those he thinks deserve it. He’s taking up to $500 million of your money, and giving it to school districts he thinks are worthy. It doesn’t matter if your kid needs it more. It doesn’t matter if that money should be directed back to fund your child’s education. Obama has set his own criteria of who is worthy of your child’s education funds. Source.

2. Education money awarded based on skin color. Mothers, your child loses your hard earned tax money for their education, if they don’t have the right skin color. In the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 the Obama administration clearly says the act, “extends support for Historically Black Colleges and other Minority Serving Institutions” Let’s put that in simple terms. Your child won’t get the tax money you paid in, if they don’t have the right skin color. Source

3. Only taking advice from Department Of Education employees. The Department of Education has started the RESPECT program. They claim they want input from teachers, so they know how to fund education. One detail is that those gathering the ‘advice’ are employed by the Department of Education. This means contrary opinions against department ideas will probably get filtered out. Source

4. Unions will influence where $5 billion of your education tax money goes in 2013. The Obama 2013 budget has a ‘competitive’ program that will determine where $5 billion of your hard earned tax money will go for education. Who gets an influence on that hard earned tax money? Unions. Who cares about the needs of your child determining where your money goes, the unions know better. Source

5. Indoctrinating your children in green/environmental literacy. Since they can’t brainwash parents with the liberal Earth worship, they are going right to the kids. Here is something from Department of Education President Arne Duncan.

America simply cannot meet any of these challenges without collaborating with other countries. And those partnerships will require U.S. students to develop better critical thinking, a deeper understanding of science and sustainability, and a greater awareness of ecosystems and energy efficiency. Source

Interesting, use of the words ‘critical thinking’. This isn’t critical thinking, it’s subversive indoctrination in the liberal ideology of Earth worship.

If Maher Isn’t Like Limbaugh Then Michelle Obama Is A Stupid Whore Boob

admin — Sat, 03 Mar 2012 20:39:09 +0000

Conservatives have been trying to point out the liberal hypocrisy over their outrage toward Limbaugh’s comments toward Sandra Fluke. Conservatives are pointing to various derogatory and sexist comments made by Maher toward Sarah Palin and other conservative women. Conservatives are wondering why liberals weren’t outraged over Maher’s comments too. We’re trying to prove liberals are insincere because they only get outraged over Limbaugh and not Maher.

Liberals are responding back by saying that Maher and Limbaugh aren’t the same. If liberals are going to stand by this reasoning, then they agree that Michelle Obama is a stupid whore boob.

Why do I go to such extremes to prove my point? Well because there is a point to be made.

Liberals say Maher is exempt from outrage because Palin puts herself out there as a very public political figure. As opposed to Fluke who is more of a private citizen advocating for her rights.

By splitting this hair, liberals are basically saying conservatives or anyone, can make all the sexist and derogatory comments about women they want, as long as the person puts themselves out there as a major person in the political arena.

Well if they’re going to follow that logic, then they’re saying I have the right to call Michelle Obama a stupid whore boob.

I don’t see how such reasoning really advocates for women, but then again, we are talking about liberals, aren’t we?

Oh and Michelle Obama isn’t a stupid whore boob. She’s just a misinformed liberal.

Liberals Demand Women Feel Helpless & In Need Of Rescue Over Limbaugh’s Remarks

admin — Sat, 03 Mar 2012 05:34:26 +0000

Liberals always claim they free and empower women. Feminists always say they, “I don’t need no man.” Liberals claim they want women not to think of themselves as helpless needy damsels in distress, in need of rescue.

Once again, liberals are doing everything they claim to be against. They are demanding women feel helpless and distressed over the remarks made by Limbaugh to Sandra Fluke.

They act like the mean fat ogre Limbaugh has captured Ms. Fluke and is holding her hostage in his mean conservative sexist castle.

Liberals say Rush is an ignorant fat man addicted to drugs. If liberals really want women to feel empowered and not like victims in need of saving, shouldn’t they just instruct women to ignore the fat drug addict who is howling at the moon?

Liberals are demanding women have an extreme emotional reaction to the man they view as a drug addicted sexist moon howler. Why should an independent woman, who is empowered, feel a need to get all emotional about the blatherings of someone they view as a fat drug addict?

Do Conservatives Secretly Like The Health Mandate?

admin — Sat, 03 Mar 2012 04:52:39 +0000

I’ve been trying to wrap my mind around the reason conservatives are behind two candidates (Mitt, Newt) who supported a health mandate. I may have found my answer.

Some conservatives may secretly favor a health mandate. Let’s look at the psychology of conservatism.

Conservatives hate the government telling them what to do. Thus the reason many oppose the mandate. On the other hand, conservatives also despise paying the bill for people not willing to pay their own way.

On one hand, a health mandate is telling us what to do, but on the other hand it is demanding people pay their own way (To a certain extent.).

So what we have in the psychology of the conservative mind is two opposing ideals. I think secretly, some conservatives like the idea of telling people, “Hey you gotta pay your own insurance bud. I’m sick of paying for you through costs being passed on to me.” Some conservatives may be apprehensive of admitting this, because it did get passed under Obama.

Newt admits that it was the conservative think tank Heritage foundation that thought of the health mandate. Romney speaks of personal responsibility when he explains the reasoning behind his Massachusetts healthcare mandate.

I expect this to be an ongoing issue for all conservatives to wrestle with. Because if we’re being honest, the healthcare mandate does appeal to a certain aspect of our conservative psychology. Of course it runs contrary to our psychology that hates government telling us what to do.

Leno Macfarlane Make Demeaning Oral Sex Remarks Of Christine O’donnell

admin — Sat, 03 Mar 2012 02:54:03 +0000

The selective moral outrage from the left on issues of demeaning sexual talk about women is pathetic. Here is another example where the left failed to have outrage over sexualized and demeaning talk about a woman.

Seth Macfarlane was on the Leno show, and they were engaging in purely sexist and demeaning talk about Christine O’donnell. Macfarlane was going on and on about how he’d like to have sex with her. Leno then makes an oral sex joke about her.

Where is all the outrage? Where are the calls for boycotts? Why aren’t they demanding resignations and firings? They weren’t just horsing around, they were engaged in political discussion.

If this had been the Rush show and he and his guest were engaging in this type of talk over a Democrat woman candidate for office, well we can only imagine what would happen. This entry needs no further comment. Watch the video below.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuwcqL_73so

Why No Liberal Outrage Over Derogatory Sexual Terms Used Of Tea Party Women?

admin — Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:22:46 +0000

(Repost this on Twitter/Facebook/Social Media to annoy a liberal. It feels good!)

Liberals are feigning outrage over some comments made by Rush about a law student (Sandra Fluke) who testified before congress concerning funding for birth control. Link They’re saying his speech was misogynistic, sexist, hateful, and whatever other liberal dog whistle buzz words they decide to throw against the wall. She even received a call from president Obama.

Let me be very clear. This is nothing but feigned outrage and crocodile tears from the liberals and Democrats. How do I know this? Because of their deafening silence in other areas.

For three years, conservative women have been participating in the Tea Party movement. For three years the liberal media/commentators/comedians have been referring to women in the movement with very sexual and derogatory terms. Where is the liberal outrage over this? There isn’t any. Their deafening silence, proves their lack of sincerity in their outrage over Sandra Fluke and Limbaugh.

I’ll give another example. The Spreading Santorum Internet meme, sexualizes and degrades Santorum. Santorum has daughters. His daughters shouldn’t have to hear their dad talked about in this degrading way. Why aren’t liberals standing up with moral outrage over his daughters having hurt feelings? Again, because they lack sincerity on this whole exploiting women issue.

Liberals are the true exploiter of women. They’re exploiting Sandra Fluke as a way to bring down Rush Limbaugh. They’re scaring women about birth control as a way to drive them to the polls and get Obama elected. Democrats exploit women by telling them they need tax payer funded birth control pills. Big Pharma donates to Obama and the Democrats. More demand for pills means more revenue for Obama’s donors.

Liberals feign, and fake outrage over the exploitation of women, as they actually spend time exploiting women for political advantage.

Al Shaprton Uses Out Of Touch White Guy Stereotypes To Scare African Amercans

admin — Thu, 01 Mar 2012 19:46:52 +0000

Al Sharpton is at it again, trying to scare African Americans, by appealing to liberal dog whistle buzz words, meant to create panic over white Republican candidates. Al Sharpton sees the high unemployment, high gas prices, and fickle recovery his failed president gave him. Sharpton knows he must scare his audience by framing the Republicans as the out of touch white guys, who are out to get them. Link

Sharpton refers to Romney as, “Willard” Mitt Romney. He labels Romney as “devoid of passion”. When referencing Santorum, Shartpon calls him, “Rick I don’t believe in higher education Santorum”. Of the Republican party Sharpton says they want to, “suppress votes of people of color.”

The untrained political ear won’t grasp Sharpton’s pathetic attempt to scare African Americans. Sharpton is using highly customized liberal buzz words to alert his audience to a perceived, but fake danger.

Sharpton uses the name Willard, because it creates the image of this out of touch rich white guy, living in his mansion, counting his money as he shouts orders to his black underlings. Sharpton must scare African Americans with this imagery, because the reality Obama has handed us is simply unpalatable.

“Devoid of passion” is another liberal dog whistle word. The stereotype he’s trying to project is one of the dispassionate white guy, sitting behind his wooden desk in the office, feet on the desk, smoking his cigar, immune to the cares of black America.

“Rick I don’t believe in higher education Santorum” is Sharpton’s attempt to frame Republicans as the oppressive white guys who don”t want African Americans educated and empowered.

His reference to “suppress votes of people of color” is rather obvious. He’s trying to scare African Americans in to thinking the white guys want to turn the water hoses on them.

Sharpton really needs to stop the racial stereotyping. His stereotyping projects white Republicans as people out to return to the days of “Whites Only”, and “Separate But Equal”.

Those days should scare people of color. That history is a blemish still soiling the culture of our nation. What Sharpton fails to realize is that by perpetuating these stereotypes, he’s not helping to remove that soiled stain from the garments of freedom. Rather he tosses more mud on the clothes we’re trying to get clean.

The Brochure Obama Should Really Be Handing Out

admin — Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:49:32 +0000

Obama Democrats Party Of Orgasms & Abortions Not Jobs And Low Priced Gas

admin — Thu, 01 Mar 2012 00:26:50 +0000

As you’re desperately dangling in your Obama weaved safety net, you can rest assured of one thing concerning Obama and the Democratic Party. They are thoroughly obsessed and fighting for your right to have a tax payer funded orgasm and/or abortion.

Yes Obama and his Democratic Party don’t care about jobs and the price of gas, they’re too busy fighting for their right to have sex, free of responsibility, all on the backs (No pun intended.) of tax payers and future tax payers.

Everyone says conservatives are out of touch with Americans that are paying high gas prices, and facing high unemployment. Such an assertion is pure hog wash. As soon as anyone even dares suggest that the tax payers and Catholic priests don’t have to pay for someone’s right to have sex free of personal responsibility, the liberals pivot from jobs and the economy, to your right to have a hard working American pay for your right to have sex without any responsibility.

Obama and his Democrats don’t care about jobs, and unemployment. All they care about is funding their responsibility free lifestyle. A lifestyle filled with orgasms and murder of the unborn, funded by tax payers. They claim to be the party of jobs. They may be the party of jobs, but it’s not the kind of jobs most of us worry about.

Video: Obama Complains About Secret Service Detail As Gas Prices Soar

admin — Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:07:13 +0000

Obama continues to lose touch with hard working Americans. In a speech to hard working union workers, he complained about his Secret Service detail, and how that prevents him from buying a Chevy Volt. He said he really wants to sit in a Volt and drive one.

How out of touch is Obama getting? Does he really think people can relate to a guy with a Secret Service detail? These people pay $5 a gallon for gas, and can’t afford a Volt, and there he is complaining about having a Secret Service detail.

Is this Obama’s best attempt to ‘connect’ with hard working and suffering Americans? Will Obama send a video of him complaining about his Secret Service detail and his inability to drive a Volt, to all those receiving food stamps?

I’m sure those living off of noodles and beans will feel consoled by their president who has the mountain sized problem of a Secret Service detail that prevents him from driving a Chevy Volt. Yes Obama, I’m sure people will feel peace as they pay $5 a gallon gas, knowing that you love sitting in a Chevy Volt, and that the Secret Service is just so mean and prevents you from getting one.

I have a solution for Obama’s Secret Service problems. How about we vote him out? Then he won’t have these Secret Service problems to deal with. Oh wow, and then he could sit in a Chevy Volt all he wants.

Unbelievable how out of touch he is with suffering Americans.

Bill Against Sexist Abortions Gets Opposition From NARAL

admin — Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:46:23 +0000

The Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act H.R. 3541, just passed in the house judiciary committee. The bill is meant to prohibit abortions based on the race or sex of a child. The bill would stop abortions if a doctor knows the abortion is done because of race or gender.

NARAL president Nancy Keenan stands opposed to the bill.

Wait! Isn’t NARAL supposed to be pro-woman? How does opposing a bill that protects women, actually protect women?

Link

Mitt Romney Wins Michigan Primary – Santorum Second

admin — Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:51:18 +0000

Mitt Romney wins the Michigan primary. Rick Santorum finishes second.

I’m projecting this as a win for Mitt. There are still many votes left to count, but Santorum is 20,000 behind Mitt. Santorum isn’t going to make up that amount of votes at this point.

I have no idea why the networks aren’t calling this. You can’t pull 20,000 votes out of nowhere at this point. Maybe they want the ratings?

Obama Imposes His Religion To Push His Agenda In UAW Speech – VIDEO

admin — Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:03:04 +0000

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdaDiGAPdnw
Last week the liberals foamed at the mouth over conservatives like Santorum using their faith to impose their own agenda in our country. They acted like right wing Christians were going to haul everyone off to vacation Bible school against their will. Why did the left create so much fuss over this? Probably so we won’t observe one fact.

The left uses religion to impose their agenda. In a speech today to the UAW, Obama made a reference to being your brother’s keeper, as justification for the massive auto bailouts. Anyone who knows their Bible, knows that this is clearly a reference to Cain and Abel.

Genesis 4

8And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him.

9And the LORD said unto Cain, Where is Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother’s keeper?

10And he said, What hast thou done? the voice of thy brother’s blood crieth unto me from the ground.

I want to see the left rise up with just as much outrage over Obama’s use of his religion to impose his beliefs, as they do over a Santorum, Gingrich, and Romney.

Think about the craziness of this. A massive overhaul of a private business is justified by appealing to verses in the Bible. If a conservative used the Bible for these purposes, we’d hear no end of it.

Pro-choice Is Sexist Against Men

admin — Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:07:54 +0000

The pro-choice movement is very sexist against men. Pro-choice is sexist because it allows a woman the ‘choice’ to get away from the results of having sex, but it doesn’t allow men the same option.

When I’m discussing the pro-choice vs. pro-life issue with someone, we eventually arrive at the issue of personal responsibility. I say that a woman choosing to have sex, needs to take responsibility for the chance she may become pregnant. An abortion shouldn’t be her way out. Because if the sex wasn’t forced, then pro-choice is really pro-second choice, since she chose to have sex in the first place.

At this point, the pro-choicer usually replies with some version of, “Getting pregnant doesn’t always have to be a consequence of having sex. People have sex for fun, so linking sex to always having to get pregnant, isn’t really legitimate. A woman can have sex without having to worry about any consequences of getting pregnant.”

At this point, the pro-choicer tries to separate the act of sex, from the result of getting pregnant. They argue that a woman can choose to have sex and then also choose to not to have the result of sex, which is getting pregnant. Depending on my mood, I may say, “Well if she didn’t want to deal with the results of having sex, she shouldn’t have had sex in the first place.” Usually that gets met with a look of disdain.

Here is where the pro-choice argument gets very sexist. I then ask the pro-choice woman, “Should the man be able to choose whether or not he wants to financially support the kid?”

I have never been met with the answer, “YES!”

Usually after the scornful answer of, “NO.” I ask why.

The pro-choice woman will say some version of, “Because the pregnancy only involves my body. I’m the one who has to go through it.”

To which I reply with, “But the guy will have to spend 18+ years working with his body to support the kid. Why doesn’t the man get to opt out of dealing with the results of his sex, but you do? Yes you have to go through giving birth with your body, but he’ll have to work with his body to support the kid. Isn’t that kind of sexist?”

A woman may say to the man, “Well if you didn’t want to deal with the results of having sex, you shouldn’t have had sex in the first place.”

I would totally agree with this point. On the other hand, that point could be said to the woman too. Instead of her pro-second choice of having an abortion, she could have chosen just not to have sex in the first place.

Pro-choice is sexist because it allows a woman the ‘choice’ to get away from the results of having sex, but it doesn’t allow men the same option.

What’s the solution? The solution is going back to what worked. Let’s teach our children that sex isn’t just an animalistic act, carried on by ‘sexual beings’ outside of marriage. Let’s teach them that they do have self-control and can wait until marriage. We can teach our children the true beauty of sex between a committed couple within the marriage. It worked before, it can work again.

Invitation To Online Interview To Any Candidate For Any Office From Any Party Perspective

admin — Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:03:49 +0000

I’m offering this chance to an online interview to any candidate for any office, from any party or perspective. Please answer the questions below. Email them to mail@conservativesnetwork.com. The email must come from an official campaign email address, that is obviously from the campaign. The questions below are worded so it’s difficult to wiggle out of them with vague answers.

1. Tell us about yourself. What kind of life background do you have? What kind of work? Describe your family.

2. Why are you running for office? Which office are you running for? Describe your motivations.

3. List five personal strengths and five personal weaknesses. Might as well air it out here, you know your opponent will.

4. Do you believe an unborn baby with a heartbeat, in the womb of a mother who wasn’t forced to have sex, has a right to be born?

5. Under what circumstances should someone be allowed to carry a concealed weapon?

6. How do you balance the rights of the LGBT community with the necessity of protecting the traditional family?

7. What do you view as the top four threats to our nation and why?

8. What is the place of faith in the public square?

9. How do we protect the rights of people of faith and the rights of those who choose not to have faith?

10. What is your vision for the office you’re running for?

The Liberal War To Control Your Body

admin — Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:42:55 +0000

Did you know the liberals have a full on assault and war to control your body? That’s right, they want to tell you what to do. They’re only pro-choice because that kills people. Honestly that’s the only choice they want you to have.

Through their excessive entitlement programs, they seek to control your body from the time you exit the womb, assuming you’re lucky enough, and the time you get planted in the ground after being killed off by a death panel.

How exactly do the liberals plan to control your body? No not necessarily through dietary regulations. Rather through enslaving you to the state.

They seek to create so many government programs and entitlements, you will literally have to work 365 days a year just to pay for it. That’s right, we often forget that when we’re working, and that work is going to pay for all these government programs, it’s our body doing the work for the government.

They want you working so much for the government programs, that you won’t have time for your kids. Once they destroy the family that way, kids will become dependents on the state, and will have to follow rules set by the state for all recipients of government programs.

Liberals will have us all so poor, that we’ll all become dependent on government programs. Once we’re dependent, they can set the rules. We’ll work every day of the year for the government programs and entitlements. We’ll have our freedom destroyed because we’ll have to follow certain rules in order to receive those government entitlements we’ll need just to get food on our table. With the family unit destroyed, the government will reeducate the next generation however they want to, because the parents will be too busy being slaves to the state.

Liberals Want A Secular Sharia

admin — Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:12:00 +0000

Any aware person has observed the scrutiny liberals give any statement or action from a devout, committed Christian full of conviction. Christians are labeled as hateful, enemies of the state and even murderers. Liberals seize on the most frivolous missteps of Christians in order to stigmatize and speak negatively of Christians.

Liberals do not apply the same level of scrutiny to Islam and Muslims. This has to leave us begging a huge question. Why?

Liberals find something in sharia law they want to mirror. Sharia punishes and destroys anyone who dares go against the standards of sharia. Sharia covers every aspect of living, and has complete control.

Liberals want to set up their own secular sharia. A standard of living and thinking that will control every part of life. Any deviation from the secular sharia will call for the harshest of punishment and even death.

Romney Must Disavow Any Help From Racism Profiteer Ron Paul

admin — Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:23:16 +0000

Ron Paul is one of the top five most disgusting candidates to run for president in the last 50 years. He’s financially profited off of racism, link, kept donations from known racist group leaders, link, and he’s campaigned under the false guise as the constitutional consistent candidate. link

There is much speculation about Ron Paul and Mitt Romney partnering together in support of each other. link In a CBS interview Paul confirmed he is only going after the ‘non-Romney’ candidates. link

It’s hard to verify if there is organized support between these two campaigns. There is clearly some assistance going on by Ron Paul toward Romney.

Mitt Romney must come out and denounce/disavow any perceived or actual help from Ron Paul. Ron Paul is a racism profiteer, and any links to him must be firmly broken. Refusal to clearly disavow links to Ron Paul will mark him as a partner to the worst amongst us, and may also give Obama a clear line of attack.

To accept any perceived or actual help from Ron Paul is in fact to become party and partner to the worst and most disgusting amongst us.

Ron Paul Admits He Is Romney’s Wingman

admin — Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:20:36 +0000

From a CBS interview. Link

As for the Texas Congressman’s attack ads, which have been harsh on Santorum but absent on Romney, particularly in Michigan, Paul said that “right now the anti-Romney candidate is Santorum, so I have to get his votes, as I did at one time with Gingrich.”

There you have it. Notice he says he is only going after the votes of the anti-Romney? Why not go after the votes of Romney too?

The answer to that is simple, because he’s favoring Romney.

He’s trying to get the votes away from people that are leading Romney. He is Romney’s wingman.

If Ron Paul was trying to get votes from all in the GOP, he’d go after those supporting Romney too.

This is no longer a conspiracy theory.

Of course the Paulbots will try and tell us what Ron Paul really said. They do that a lot. Because usually what Ron Paul says makes Ron Paul look bad. So he has to rely on a few thousand editors and chiefs to clean up his verbal messes.

Hey Ronulians, how does it feel funding Mitt Romney’s SuperPac? How does it feel helping a man who is everything Ron Paul claims he’s against? How does it feel knowing your stash money is going to fund a guy who will keep pot illegal? No legal fat ones for you losers. The only fat one here is the fat lie Ron Paul is telling you losers.
Follow Us..

The Liberal 10 Ten Commandments

admin — Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:46:05 +0000

Conservatives Network offers you The Liberal 10 Commandments. If you repost/reuse these, please give reference back to Conservatives Network. Thanks.

1. You can not hold any deep Christian beliefs or convictions. Islam is fine.

2. You can not have Christian images in public places. You must have non-Christian images in public places. We do have to be tolerant and sensitive.

3. You can say anything demeaning about Jesus you want regardless of the feelings of Christians. Don’t you dare speak evil of Allah, we might hurt the feelings of Muslims.

4. Every day is a day of rest. You don’t have to work for stuff, those hard working rich people that rarely rest can buy it for you.

5. Don’t listen to mom and dad, assuming you have those. We’re actually trying to destroy the family so children get their values from the government.

6. Feel free to murder the helpless, innocent unborn. They’re really not human, even if they have brain waves and a heart beat.

7. Go ahead and cheat on your wife/husband. You’re just a sexual being, an animal, totally incapable of controlling yourself.

8. Don’t go stealing directly from people. On the other hand don’t feel an ounce of shame demanding hard working people pay for your entitlements, even if you can get off your own lazy butt and work.

9. Cheating and lying is fine. People can cross our borders illegally, steal Social Security numbers, and steal identities. They’re just trying to better themselves.

10. Be jealous of people that have stuff you don’t own. Life is just about being a fulfilled sexual being and getting all the material stuff you want without actually working for it.

Reexamining Media Bias – What If You’re The Biased One?

admin — Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:22:07 +0000

Some assume a news organization is biased because they report news you don’t like. This is a false assumption.

The fact is, there are events in the world you won’t agree with. Reporting those events doesn’t make the organization biased. What makes an organization biased is when they spin news from an angle, and when they are selective about which events they report.

MSNBC and The New York Times tend to report on facts. The problem is they tend to report the events that fit their bias. Should this prevent us from consuming their content? If you say yes, you may be biased.

If they are reporting the truth, then what is the problem? The only problem is that it’s truth that you don’t want to hear. Which makes you just as biased as them.

Media bias is a problem. Viewer bias is a problem too. Some people simply congregate to the news they agree with, and plug their ears to factual news they disagree with.

How does this make us informed?

Consumers of news need to grow up. Yes news organizations are biased, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t reporting on factual and actual events. The job of the responsible news consumer is to put their bias down and listen to truth as told from all biases.

Liberal Dominionists Would Kill Converts To Christianity

admin — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:55:36 +0000

We must resist the slow creep of the liberal dominionists. It’s very clear they strive to exercise total dominance of people, by destroying their faith, freedom, and making them totally dependent on government.

To learn the heart of a liberal dominionist, we should look at the things they appear sympathetic toward.

We notice they have little tolerance for personal Christian convictions. On the other hand, they seem to demand people be sympathetic to the most extreme practices of radical Islam. If they don’t demand sympathetic attitudes, their total ignoring of their worst practices can not be over looked.

Recently in Iran the Muslims ordered a Christian pastor put to death. Link Did you notice liberal dominionists are more concerned over the Catholic church paying for birth control than they are over a Christian being murdered for their faith? Why is this?

Because the liberal dominionist views sharia law as a template for dealing with Christians.

What Is Liberal Dominionism?

admin — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:42:49 +0000

The liberal dominionist agenda is too..

1.Secularize the world to the extent people can’t hold personal deep religious convictions.
2.Put secular government as the dictator of religious belief and practice.
3.Make people so poor they become dependent on the government, so the liberal dominionist can exercise total domination and control of the population.

Pro-choice Is About Selfish-Dominance And Power Not Choice And Health

admin — Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:38:42 +0000

Pro-choice advocates tell us it’s about health and choice. This is a candy coated explanation to cover up the true disgusting motives of the pro-choice movement.

The human heart is complicated, and full of contradictions. Humans are capable of extreme good, and the worst kind of evil. We’re all a grab bag of high values and despicable passions.

Women are not immune from the despicable passions of the human heart. Women aren’t just sugar and spice and everything nice. They have puppy dog tails too.

Women aren’t immune from having murderous and violent tendencies. Men exercise their evil sense of control through rape, women do it through the silent murder of their unborn and helpless babies.

Pro-choice is really about giving women the power to exercise total dominance and power over someone that is weaker.

The heart of a woman has the grand virtue of giving birth to life and sacrificing to help raise and nurture the child. Unfortunately the heart of a woman has a dark shadow capable of exercising total dominance and power over the helpless life in her womb.

For now our culture has chosen to nurture that dark shadow of the human heart. Hopefully with enough persuasion we can shine the life giving light of life and wipe that shadow away.